|
The Natural Connection
|
|
|
A scientific truism is that the
more experts don’t understand about a topic, the more they tend to write about
it. I knew I was heading out to muddy water when I began to research the
scientific data on the role of magnet therapy in healing and found “about
30,900” web pages listed on my Internet browser’s search engine. To put this in perspective,
compared to Silly Putty, which even children comprehend and merits only 17,800
pages, and Bill Clinton, whom nearly no one understands, but who gets over
1,130,000 web pages, magnet therapy falls somewhere in the middle. Legend has it that magnets were
“discovered” around 1000 BC, when a shepherd in Asia Minor named Magnes
found himself drawn to the earth by the tacks in his saddle. He unearthed a
magnetic oxide of iron, or “lodestone” that had the curious property of
being able to attract iron to itself. Physicians of China, India, and Egypt used
natural lodestones for centuries for healing illness. By the 1740’s it was
possible to create “artificial lodestones” by magnetizing ordinary pieces of
iron, and magnet therapy became popular in Europe as well. Over
the next 250 years, magnets were used by a wide assortment of healers. The 16th
century physician and alchemist, Paracelsus, used magnets to treat epilepsy,
diarrhea, and hemorrhage. Franz Mesmer, an Austrian doctor sometimes called the
“father of hypnotism”, opened a popular magnetic healing salon in Paris in
1740, where he prescribed magnets to treat the untoward effects of the body’s
innate “animal magnetism”. By the late 1800s, the Sears catalogue advertised
magnetic boot inserts, magnetic caps, and magnetic corsets, some containing as
many as 700 magnets. It was asserted that “magnetism properly applied will
cure every curable disease, no matter what the cause!” While
mail-order corsets may have nearly slipped into oblivion, magnet therapy has
not. Thousands of patients swear by the ability of magnets to relieve pain,
enhance energy, or protect them from illness. Magnet products are now widely
available in the form of magnet insoles,
mattresses, car-seat covers, and small magnets to be placed on various parts of
the body. Although the sales of magnets for health benefits comprise a 5
billion dollar international industry, medical experts have been uncertain
whether their appeal is based on fact, or more like a corset, based on illusion. The
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) of the NIH
considers bioelectromagnetics to be an emerging science that studies how living
organisms interact with electromagnetic fields. Two centers supported by NCCAM
are currently studying the effects of magnet therapy. One study from the University of Virginia published in 1999
in the Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehab, concerning the ability of
magnet mattress pads to reduce the pain of fibromyalgia, showed a modest
improvement in patients using the magnetic mattress pads. Another, examining the
role of magnets in preventing strokes, is currently under way at the Kessler
Rehabilitation Center in West Orange, N.J. While
magnetized mattress pads could possibly provide pain relief to some patients,
they should be avoided in patients with pacemakers and implanted defibrillators.
It has been shown that the magnets laced into the mattress pads can temporarily
disable these cardiac devices if the patient lies with the magnet close to the
chest. Small magnets applied to areas other than the chest do not seem to pose a
danger, however. Other studies have shown
magnets effective at reducing pain in post-polio patients and diabetics. A 1997
peer reviewed study by Dr. Carlos Vallbona at Houston's Baylor College of
Medicine found a 75 percent success rate in a study of 50 post-polio syndrome
patients who applied low-intensity magnets to areas where they felt arthritis
and muscle pain. Despite the dramatic success of the magnetic therapy, Dr.
Vallbona admits that he does not know how magnets cause relief of pain. In
yet another study published in 1999 in the American Journal of Pain Management,
New York neurologist Michael Weintraub reported that 24 patients found magnetic
footpad insoles worn for 16 weeks partially relieved chronic foot pain caused by
diabetic neuropathy. A larger study enrolling 400 patients is planned. Despite
these encouraging reports, an equal number exist in the medical literature that
appear to show no apparent benefit to magnet therapy at all. The authors often
admit that they may need to use stronger magnets, or apply them for greater time
periods. I hope that sometime before I have to finish reading the next 30,823
web pages on magnet therapy, someone will settle the debate. For
more information on magnet therapy, write to The Natural Connection, c/o Pauline
Bellecci MD, PO Box 777, Waycross, GA 31502 or contact us on our web site www.swampdocs.com 1/29/01 |
|
©2000-2003 Pauline M. Bellecci, MD
|